Wireless test system

ABSTRACT

One or more testers wirelessly communicate with one or more test stations. The wireless communication may include transmission of test commands and/or test vectors to a test station, resulting in testing of one or more electronic devices at the test station. The wireless communication may also include transmission of test results to a tester. Messages may also be wirelessly exchanged.

BACKGROUND

Although this invention is generally applicable to test systems and methods in general, it is particularly suited for semiconductor device testing.

As known, semiconductor devices are typically manufactured many at a time as “dice” on a semiconductor wafer, after which the dice are further processed before being shipped to customers or installed in various products. That further processing may take many forms.

In perhaps the most common post-manufacture processing, the dice are probed while still in wafer form and initial testing is performed on each die. Thereafter, the dice are singulated from the wafer, and the dice that passed the initial probe testing are packaged, burned in, and further tested. In another common process, the dice are not packaged after being singulated from the wafer but are further tested and often burned in to produce “known good dice,” which are unpackaged dice that have been fully tested. In more advanced processes, the dice are burned in and fully tested while in wafer form. In all of these exemplary post-manufacture processes, as well as other scenarios in which electronic devices of any kind are tested, there is a need to control testing and/or exercising of the dice or other electronic devices.

BRIEF SUMMARY

The present invention relates generally to test systems and methods. In an embodiment of the invention, one or more testers wirelessly communicate with one or more test stations. The wireless communication may include transmission of test commands, test vectors, test results, and/or messages.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of major elements of an exemplary test system.

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary process that may be run by the controller 140 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary process that may be run by the controllers 160 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 304 and 306 of FIG. 3.

FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of major elements of another exemplary test system.

FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 of FIG. 2 run on the controller 140 of Tester I in FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 of FIG. 2 run on the controller 140 of Tester II in FIG. 6.

FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of major elements of yet another exemplary test system.

FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 of FIG. 2 run on the controller 140 of Tester I in FIG. 9.

FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 of FIG. 2 run on the controller 140 of Tester II in FIG. 9.

FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 304 and 306 of FIG. 2 run on the controllers 160 in FIG. 9.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

The present invention relates generally to test systems and methods. This specification describes exemplary embodiments and applications of the invention. The invention, however, is not limited to these exemplary embodiments and applications or to the manner in which the exemplary embodiments and applications operate or are described herein.

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary test system 100. The system 100 includes a tester 102 and three test stations: test station A 104 a, test station B 104 b, and test station C 104 c, although more testers and fewer or more test stations may be used. Tester 102 includes wireless transceiver 106, and test stations 104 a–104 c also each include a wireless transceiver 110. Optionally, tester 102 may include a microprocessor-based control system 140. A block diagram of the basic components of an exemplary microprocessor-based control system 140 are shown in FIG. 1, which includes a microprocessor 142, a main memory 148, a program memory 150, a general input/output block 144, and a transceiver input/output block 146. Each test station 104 a–104 c may include a similar microprocessor-based control system 160, with similar elements, including a microprocessor 162, a main memory 168, a program memory 170, a general input/output block 164, and a transceiver input/output block 166.

Test station A 104 a, test station B 104 b, and test station C 104 c each includes one or more electronic devices to be tested. In the example shown in FIG. 1, all of the test stations 104 a, 104 b, 104 c are probers for probing a semiconductor wafer 114 comprising a plurality of dice 116 a, 116 b, 116 c. Thus, the electronic device to be tested in each of test stations 104 a–104 c is a wafer 114 or more specifically the dice 116 a–116 c. (Three dice 116 a, 116 b, 116 c per wafer 114 are shown in FIG. 1 for simplicity. Typically, many more dice are fabricated on a wafer.)

As known, such probers typically include a moveable chuck 120, a probe card 108 having probes 112 for contacting pads 118 on one or more of the dice 116 a, 116 b, 116 c. Test stations 104 a, 104 b, 104 c, however, need not be probers but may be any type of apparatus in which an electronic device is tested or exercised. Nonlimiting examples include an apparatus comprising sockets, test probes, or load boards for holding packaged or unpackaged (singulated) semiconductor dice during testing and/or burn in. Another example is an apparatus for testing multi-chip modules. (The term “testing,” as used herein, is intended to cover broadly any form of exercising an electronic device that is part of a larger process of determining the usability, functionality, performance, or reliability of the electronic device. Thus, for example, the term “testing” includes exercising a semiconductor device during burn in regardless of whether the device is monitored or analyzed during the exercising.) Tester 102 controls testing of the electronic devices 114.

Transceivers 106 and 110 allow the tester 102 and the test stations 104 a–104 c to communicate wirelessly. Thus, although tester 102 and test stations 104 a–104 c may be located near each other, each may be located remotely from the others. Element 122 in FIG. 1 represents an optional physical separation between the tester 102 and the test stations 104 a–104 c. Thus, tester 102, on one hand, and test stations 104 a–104 c, on the other hand, may be located in different rooms, different buildings, or even different geographical locations. The wireless link between the tester 102 and each of the test stations 104 a–104 c may be any type of wireless link, including without limitation any type of optical or radio signal link and may include such intermediate elements as repeaters and/or communication satellites. Indeed, the tester 102 and its transceiver 106 may be remotely located one from another with a communication network, such as a local area network, wide area network, or metropolitan area network or the Internet, between them. Although not shown in FIG. 1, test stations 104 a–104 c may also be physically separated or located remotely one from another.

FIG. 2 illustrates basic operation of the tester 102, and FIG. 3 illustrates basic operation of a test station 104. (Reference to “104” without specifying “a,” “b,” or “c” refers to any one or more of the test stations.) At step 202, the tester 102 is initialized, and at step 302 a test station is initialized. At step 204, the tester 102 sends wirelessly test data to a test station 104, and at step 304, the test station 104 tests an electronic device 114 in accordance with the test data. At step 306, the test station 104 transmits wirelessly results of the testing to the tester 102, which is received by the tester at step 206.

As one option, the processes shown in FIG. 2 may be implemented in the tester 102 as software (including firmware or microcode) stored in program memory 150 and executed by microprocessor 142. Similarly, the process illustrated in FIG. 3 may be implemented in a test station 104 as software stored in program memory 170 and executed by microprocessor 162. In the tester 102, data to be transmitted by the transceiver 106 and data received via the transceiver 106 may be output or input through the transceiver input/output block 146. Other data may be input or output through the general input/output block 144. The general input/output block 164 and the transceiver input/output block 166 in a test station's microprocessor-based controller 160 may be generally similar to like elements in the tester's controller 140.

The test data sent by the tester 102 to a test station 104 may be in any format recognizable by the test station. As one example, the test data may be test vectors that include both the data to be written to the electronic device under test 114 and an identification of the probes through which the test data is to be written. In such case, the test station 104 simply places data on the probes as specified by the test vectors. As another example of a format for the test data, the test data may comprise commands that cause a test station 104 to generate test vectors for testing a die 116 a–116 c. The results data transmitted by a test station 104 back to the tester 102 may likewise be in any format recognizable by the tester 102, which may range from raw data generated by the die 116 a–116 c to data representing an analysis or summary of the response of the die 116 a–116 c to the test data.

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 from FIG. 2, and FIG. 5 illustrates a corresponding implementation of steps 304 and 306 from FIG. 3. The exemplary processes of FIGS. 4 and 5 will be discussed with respect to the test system 100 shown in FIG. 1. As will be seen, the process of FIG. 4 causes the tester 102 to initiate testing at the test stations 104 a–104 c, after which the tester 102 waits for messages from the test stations 104 a–104 c indicating that testing is completed. Upon receiving such a message, the tester 102 requests transfer of the test results data.

For purposes of illustration, it will be assumed that test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b are initialized at step 302 of FIG. 3. This initialization may include such things as loading wafers 114 to be tested into test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b. Initialization may also include loading data into the main memory 168 of the microprocessor-based control system 160 in each of test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b. If the test data to be received from the tester 102 comprise test commands, a command table for decoding the commands may also be loaded into the main memory 168 of each of the test stations 104 a and 104 b. To complete initialization, each test station 104 a and 104 b sends a request to the tester 102 to be brought on line for testing. The request may include data both identifying the test station and the type of wafer loaded into the test station.

In the mean time, the tester 102 is also initialized at step 202 of FIG. 2. Initialization of the tester 102 may include such things as loading a list of wafer types and tests to be run on each wafer type into the main memory 148 of the microprocessor-based control system 140 in the tester 102. As mentioned above, in this example, it is assumed that the test sequences are defined by one or a series of test commands. To complete initialization, the tester 102 brings all test stations 104 from which a message requesting to be brought on line has been received. This may be done, for example, by creating a list of the test stations to be brought on line and the wafer type in each test station, and storing the list in the main memory 148 of the controller 140 in the tester 102.

After initialization of both the tester 102 and test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b, the tester 102 is ready to begin executing the process illustrated in FIG. 4, and each on-line test station—test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b—is ready to begin executing the process shown in FIG. 5. (Note that in this example, test station C 104 c was not initialized and brought on line for testing.)

As shown in FIG. 4, the tester 102 selects a test station at step 402. The selected test station may be any of the on-line test stations as listed in the tester's main memory 148. In this example, there are two test stations—test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b—listed as on-line in the tester's main memory 148, and the tester 102 selects test station A 104 a at step 402. At step 404, the tester 102 initiates testing of the wafer 114 in the selected test station 104 a. As mentioned above, in this example, the tester 102 does so by transmitting wirelessly to the selected test station—test station A 104 a—a test command or a series of test commands. To do so, the tester 102 looks in its main memory 148 at the type of wafer in the selected test station 104 a, and then retrieves, also from its main memory 148, the test command or series of test commands for that wafer type. The test command or commands define the test(s) to be performed on the dice of that wafer type. Step 404 may also include setting a flag in the tester's main memory 148 indicating that testing is underway in the selected tester 104 a.

After initiating testing at the selected test station 104 a at step 404, the tester 102 determines at step 406 whether it has received any messages. If not, the tester selects another of the on-line testers at step 408. The tester 102 may do so by searching the list of on-line test stations in the tester's main memory 148 for a test station where testing is neither underway nor completed. In this example, the tester 102 selects test station B 104 b at step 408 and then repeats step 404, initiating testing in the newly selected test station B 104 b by wirelessly transmitting a test command or series of test commands, as described above. In this example, there are only two test stations on line—test station A 104 a, and test station B 104 b. In other examples involving more on-line test stations, this process would continue to be repeated.

During this process, if a message is received, execution branches at 406 so that the message is decoded and any necessary action taken. If the message is from a test station 116 a–116 c indicating that testing at that test station 104 has completed (see step 410), then the tester 102 processes the results of the testing at step 412. Processing the test results (step 412) may include such things as sending a message to the test station requesting transmission of the test results. (Alternatively, if the test results were transmitted with the message from the test station, the tester 102 reads the test results from an internal buffer (not shown).) Step 412 may also include additional actions, such as setting a flag in the tester's main memory 148 indicating that testing has completed at that test station. If, as shown in FIG. 1, the test station contacts less than all of the dice 116 a–116 c on the wafer 114 being tested, step 412 may include causing the test station to reposition the wafer 114 to contact an as yet untested die or dice. After processing the test results at step 412, the process of FIG. 4 repeats step 408 of selecting a new test station, from which the process beginning with step 404 is repeated as necessary to initiate testing at the test stations.

If the message detected at step 406 was a request from a new test station to be brought on line or a request from an on-line test station to be taken off line (see step 414), then the new test station is brought on line at step 416 or the on-line test station is brought off line at step 416. Bringing a new test station on line may include such things as adding the new test station's identifier and wafer type to the list of on-line test stations stored in the tester's main memory 148. Likewise, taking an on-line test station off line may include such things as deleting the test station's identifier and wafer type from the same list.

In the example being discussed, only test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b were brought on line. While testing is occurring at those two test stations 104 a, 104 b, an operator may initialize test station C 104 c by, among other things, loading a wafer 114 into test station C 104 c. Test station C 104 c may then send a request to the tester 102 to be brought on line. As discussed above, the tester 102 will then bring test station C 104 c on line at step 416 of FIG. 4. Once on line, test station C 104 c will eventually be selected at step 408 and tests initiated at step 404.

As mentioned above, FIG. 5 illustrates operation of each of the test stations 104 in response to messages sent by the tester 102 during operation of the process shown in FIG. 4. As also mentioned above, FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 304 and 306 of FIG. 3 and is therefore executed after the initialization step 302 of FIG. 3. As shown in FIG. 5, each on-line test station 104 waits for a message at step 501. If a message containing a test command is received from the tester 102 (see steps 506, 510), then the test command is executed at step 512. The test command may be executed, for example, by finding the test command in a decode table stored in the test station's main memory 168 and taking the actions indicating in the decode table for the test command. As just one example, the decode table may contain a test vector or vectors that are to be written to the wafer 114. As another example, the test station 104 may generate commands that are sent to the dice 116 a–116 c and executed by self test circuitry on the dice (e.g., so called built-in-self-test circuitry). Execution of the test command may also include buffering the response data generated by the die being tested and sending a message to the tester 102 that testing is completed and response data is ready. If the message was a request from the tester 102 to send test results for testing that has completed (see step 514), then the test results (which may be buffered at the test station 104) are transmitted wirelessly to the tester at step 516. Alternatively, the test results may be stored and/or analyzed solely at the test station, and the results may be retrieved by other than the tester 102—e.g., an operator—from the test station 104.

Step 418 in FIG. 4 and step 518 in FIG. 5 illustrate other miscellaneous actions that may be taken by the tester 102 or a test station 104. Such other actions may include ending the process, handling errors, etc. In addition, provisions may be made in each process for processing multiple messages. These and other modifications and additions to the processes shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 are within the skill of the ordinary practitioner in the field and need not be discussed.

FIG. 6 illustrates another exemplary test system 600. As shown, test system 600 also includes three test stations: test station A 604 a, test station B 104 b, and test station C 104 c, although fewer or more could be used. In this example, each test station 604 a–604 c includes a load board 608 with sockets 612 for receiving singulated dice 616 a, 616 b. Each load board also includes a transceiver 610 and internal wiring (not shown) for carrying test signals and response data to and from the dice 616 a, 616 b. Each test station 604 a–604 c also includes a controller 160, which may be generally similar to controller 160 discussed above with respect to FIG. 1.

Test system 600 also includes two testers: tester I 602 a and tester II 602 b. Again, however, fewer or more testers may be used. Each tester 602 includes a transceiver 606 and a controller 140, which may also be generally similar to controller 140 discussed above with respect to FIG. 1. A communication link 626 interconnects tester I 602 a and tester II 602 b and also connects to storage unit 624. Communication link 626 may be any type of electronic communication device, including without limitation a cable, a wireless link, a computer network, etc. Like 122 in FIG. 1, element 622 represents optional physical separation.

In this example, tester I 602 a causes a first functional test (test 1) to be performed on the dice 616 a, 616 b, and tester II 602 b causes a second functional test (test 2) to be performed on the same dice. Thus, full testing of the dice 616 a, 616 b, in this example, includes both test 1 and test 2. For example, test 1 may be a fast functional test, and test 2 may be a longer, more exacting functional test. More than two sequential tests may be run on the dice 116 a, 116 b, and such tests could include exercise during burn in.

The processes shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 may also be run on the testers 602 a, 602 b and test stations 604 a–604 c of FIG. 6. That is, the process shown in FIG. 2 may be run on each of the testers 602 a, 602 b, and the process shown in FIG. 3 may be run on each of the test stations 604 a–604 c.

FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 from FIG. 2 that may be run on tester I 602 a and tester II 602 b, respectively. The process of FIG. 5, discussed above, may be implemented on each of the test stations 604 a–604 c. As will be seen, in the process of FIG. 7, tester I 602 a initiates a first test (test 1) at the test stations 604 a–604 c, after which tester I 602 a waits for a message from each test station indicating that test 1 has completed at that test station. Upon receiving such a message from a particular test station, tester I 602 a requests transfer of the results of test 1 from that particular test station, and tester I 602 a sends a message to tester II 602 b indicating that test 1 has completed at that test station. Upon receiving this message from tester I 602 a, tester II 602 b initiates test 2 at that particular test station, and then waits for a message from that test station that test 2 has been completed, after which tester 2 602 b requests the results of test 2 from the test station. Both testers 602 a, 602 b may store the results of the tests in the storage device 624.

For purposes of illustration, it will be assumed that test station A 604 a, test station B 604 b, and test station C 604 c are all initialized at step 302 of FIG. 3. This initialization may be generally similar to the initialization of test station A 104 a and test station B 104 b of FIG. 1 as described above with respect to FIGS. 3–5. For example, initialization of test station A 604 a, test station B, 604 b, and test station C 604 c may include such things as securing dice to be tested 616 a, 616 b to load boards 608, and placing a load board in each test station. Initialization data may also be loaded into the main memory 168 of the microprocessor-based control system 160 in each test station 604 a–604 c. If the test data to be received from the testers 602 a, 602 b comprise commands, a command table for decoding the commands may also be loaded into the main memory 168 of each of the test stations 604 a–604 c. To complete initialization, each test station 604 a–604 c sends a request to tester I 602 a to be brought on line for testing. The request may include data both identifying the test station and the type of dice to be tested at the test station.

In the mean time, tester I 602 a and tester II 602 b are also initialized at step 202 of FIG. 2. Initialization of the testers 602 a, 602 b may also be similar to the initialization of tester 102 described above with respect to FIGS. 2, 4, and 5. For example, initialization in each tester 602 a, 602 b may include such things as loading a list of dice types and test sequences to be run on each dice type into the main memory 148 of the microprocessor-based control system 140 in each tester 602 a, 602 b. As mentioned above, in this example, it is assumed that the test sequences are defined by one or a series of test commands. To complete initialization, tester I 602 a brings on line all test stations from which a message requesting to be brought on line has been received. This may be done, for example, by creating a list of the test stations to be brought on line and the dice type in each test station, and storing the list in the main memory 148 of the microprocessor-based control system 140 in tester I 602 a.

After initialization of the testers 602 a, 602 b and the test stations 604 a–604 c, tester I 602 a is ready to begin executing the process illustrated in FIG. 7; tester II 602 b is ready to begin executing the process illustrated in FIG. 8; and each on-line test station—test station A 604 a, test station B, 604 b, and test station C 604 c—is ready to begin executing the process shown in FIG. 5.

As shown in FIG. 7, tester I 602 a selects a test station at step 702. The selected test station may be any of the on-line test stations listed in the main memory 148 of tester I 602 a. For illustration purposes in this example, there are three test stations—test station A 604 a, test station B 604 b, and test station C 604c—listed as on-line in the main memory 168 of tester I 602 a, and tester I 602 a selects test station A 604 a at step 702. At step 704, tester I 702 initiates test 1 on the dice 616 a, 616 b at the selected test station-test station A 604 a. As mentioned above, in this example, tester I 602 a does so by transmitting wirelessly the selected test station 604 a one or a series of test commands that define test 1. Step 704 may also include setting a flag in the main memory 148 of Tester I 602 a indicating that testing is underway at the selected test station-test station A 604 a.

After initiating test 1 at the selected test station—test station A 604 a—at step 704, tester I 602 a determines at step 706 whether it has received any messages. If not, tester I 602 a selects another of the on-line testers at step 708, which may be accomplished generally as described above with respect to FIG. 4. In this example, tester I 602 a selects test station B 604 b at step 708 and then repeats step 704, initiating test 1 on the dice 616 a, 616 b in the newly selected test station, which is now test station B 604 b.

In this example, it is assumed that test station A 604 a completes test 1 and sends a message indicating as much to tester I 602 a shortly after tester I 602 a initiates test 1 at test station B 604 b. Thus, at the next pass through the process of FIG. 7, a message is detected at step 706, causing the process of FIG. 7 to branch to step 710. Because the message indicates that test 1 has completed at test station A 602 a, the process of FIG. 7 branches to step 712, where tester I 602 a processes the results of test 1 in test station 602 a. Processing the results of test 1 (step 712) may include such things as sending a message to the test station requesting transmission of the results of test 1. (Alternatively, if the test results were transmitted with the message from the test station, tester I 602 a reads the test results from an internal buffer (not shown).) Step 712 may also include additional actions, such as setting a flag in the main memory 148 of tester I 602 a indicating that test 1 has been completed at that test station.

After processing at step 712 the test results of test 1 executed at test station A 604 a, the process of FIG. 7 sends a message to tester II 602 b indicating that test 1 has completed at test station A (see step 713). As will be seen, this causes tester II 602 b to initiate test 2 at test station A 604 a. Thereafter, tester I 602 a repeats step 708 and selects this time test station C 604 c and repeats the process shown in FIG. 7 at step 704, initiating test 1 at test station C 604 c.

Referring now to FIG. 8, which illustrates exemplary operation of tester II 602 b, after initialization at step 202 of FIG. 2 (as discussed above), tester II 602 b waits for a message at step 801. Upon receiving the message from tester I 602 a that test 1 has completed at test station A 604 a (see step 713 of FIG. 7, as discussed above), tester II 602 b takes the “yes” branches at steps 806 and 807 of FIG. 8. At step 809, tester II 602 b initiates test 2 at test station A 604 a. Tester II 602 b does so by wirelessly sending to test station A 604A a command or series of commands that define test 2. As test 1 finishes in each of the remaining test stations B 604 b and C 604 c, tester I 602 a processes the results of test 1 at those test stations at step 712 of FIG. 7 and sends a message at step 713 of FIG. 7 to tester II 602 b, indicating that test 1 has completed at each of those test stations. Tester II 602 b then initiates test 2 in each of those test stations, per steps 806, 807, 809 of FIG. 8. As test 2 completes at each of the test stations 604 a–604 c, each test station sends a message to tester II 604 b. In response to each such message, tester II 604 b processes the results of test 2 at that particular test station, per steps 806, 810, 812 of FIG. 8. The step of processing test results at step 812 may be generally similar to step 412 of FIG. 4 and step 712 of FIG. 7.

During these processes, a new test station may send a message to tester I 602 a requesting to be brought on line. Likewise, an on-line test station may send a message to tester I 602 a requesting to be taken office line. Such requests are processed by tester I 602 a at steps 714, 716 of FIG. 7, and may be accomplished in a manner generally similar to step 416 of FIG. 4 as described above. As just one example, when test 2 completes in test station A 602 a, an operator may cause test station A 602 a to be taken off line, replace the now fully tested dice 116 a, 116 b with new dice to be tested, and cause test station A 602 a to be brought back on line, now as a new test station with dice to be tested. This may be accomplished by causing test station A 604 a to send tester I 602 a a message requesting to be taken off line, and then after loading a new wafer 114 to be tested into test station A 604 a, causing test station A to send tester I 602 a a message requesting to be brought on line.

It should be apparent that testers may also be brought on and off line. By strategically bringing testers and test stations on and off line as needed, a test system may be balanced for maximum data through put between tester and test stations and maximum testing efficiency.

Step 718 in FIG. 7 and step 818 in FIG. 8 illustrate other miscellaneous actions that may be taken by tester I 602 a and tester II 602 b, which may be generally similar to miscellaneous actions described above with respect to FIGS. 4 and 5.

FIG. 9 illustrates another exemplary test system 900. Test system 900 also includes three test stations: test station A 904 a, test station B 904 b, and test station C 904 c, although fewer or more may be used. In this example, each test station 904 a–904 c is a prober for probing an unsingulated semiconductor wafer 914 comprising a plurality of dice 916 a–916 d. (Again, four dice 916 a–916 d are shown for ease of illustration, but more or fewer may be present.) Such probers may be similar to the probers discussed above with respect to FIG. 1 and may include such things as a probe card 908 with probes 912 for contacting pads 918 on wafer 914 and a chuck 920 for holding and moving wafer 914. Each test station 904 a–904 c also includes a transceiver 910 and a controller 160, which may be generally similar to transceiver 910 and a controller 160 as in FIG. 1.

Test system 900 also includes two testers: tester I 902 a and tester II 902 b. Each tester includes a transceiver 906 and a controller 140, which may also be generally similar to controller 140 discussed above with respect to FIG. 1. Similar to FIG. 6, a communication link 926 interconnects tester I 902 a and tester II 902 b and also connects to storage unit 924. As discussed above with respect to FIG. 6, communication link 926 may be any type of electronic communication link. Like element 122 in FIG. 1 and element 622 in FIG. 6 (both discussed above), element 922 represents an optional physical separation. In this example, probe card 908 is capable of contacting two dice at one time. Probe card 908 is shown in FIG. 9 contacting dice 916 a, 916 b. Often a probe card will contact more than two dice, but two dice are shown in FIG. 9 for ease of illustration.

In this example, rather than send test data in the form of test commands, Tester I 902 a and Tester II 902 b send test vectors to test stations 904 a–904 c. For purposes of this example, it is assumed that neither tester 902 a, 902 b has sufficient bandwidth to send enough test vectors to test both die 916 a and die 916 b at the same time. As will be seen, Tester I and Tester II both send the same test vectors to a particular test station 904. The test station 904 uses test vectors from one tester to test one of the dice and test vectors from the other tester to test the other die.

The general process shown in FIG. 2 may also be run on the I 902 a and tester II 902 b of the test system 900 shown in FIG. 9, and the general process shown in FIG. 3 may be run on test station A 904 a, test station B 904 b, and test station C 904 c.

FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 from FIG. 2 that may be run in tester I 902 a, and FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 204 and 206 from FIG. 2 that may be run in tester II 902 b. FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary detailed implementation of steps 304 and 306 from FIG. 3 that may be run in each of test station A 904 a, test station B 904 b, and test station C 904 c. As will be seen, in the processes of FIGS. 10 and 11, tester I 902 a selects a test station having a wafer in need of testing and sends a message to tester II 902 b. Tester I 902 a then initiates testing of die 1 916 a at the selected test station, and tester II 902 b initiates testing of die 2 916 b at the selected tester. Tester I 902 a then continues to select test stations with wafers in need of testing, after which both testers continue to initiate testing of the dice at the selected test stations. As the various tests are completed, both testers collect the test results and store the results in the storage device 924. The testers 902 a, 902 b communication with the test stations 904 a, 904 b, 904 c wirelessly.

Again, for purposes of illustration, it will be assumed that test station A 904 a, test station B 904 b, and test station C 904 c are initialized at step 302 of FIG. 3. This initialization may be generally similar to the initialization of test stations 104 a and 104 b described above with respect to FIGS. 3–5. To complete initialization, each of test station A 904 a, test station B 904 b, and test station C 904 c sends a request to tester I 902 a to be brought on line for testing. The request may include data both identifying the test station and the type of wafer loaded into the test station.

In the mean time, tester I 902 a and tester II 902 b are also initialized at step 202 of FIG. 2. Initialization of the testers 902 a, 902 b may also be similar to the initialization of tester 102 described above with respect to FIGS. 2, 4, and 5. To complete initialization, tester I 902 a brings on line all test stations from which a message requesting to be brought on line has been received. This may be done, for example, by creating a list of the test stations to be brought on line and the wafer type in each test station, and storing the list in the main memory 148 of the microprocessor-based control system 140 of tester I 902 a.

After initialization of the testers 902 a, 902 b and the test stations 904 a–904 c, tester I 902 a is ready to begin executing the process illustrated in FIG. 10; tester II 902 b is ready to begin executing the process illustrated in FIG. 11; and each on-line test station 904 a–904 c is read to begin executing the process shown in FIG. 12.

As shown in FIG. 10, tester I 902 a selects a test station at step 1002. The selected test station may be any of the on-line test stations as listed in the main memory 148 of tester I 902 a. For purposes of this example, all three of the test stations—test station A 904 a, test station B 904 b, and test station C 904 c—are listed as on-line in the main memory 148 of tester I 902 a, and tester I 902 a selects test station A 904 a at step 1002. At step 1003, tester I 902 a sends a message to tester II 902 b that test station A 904 a is selected. Thereafter, at step 1004, tester I 902 a initiates testing on the first die 916 a of wafer 914 in test station A 904 a. In this example, tester I 902 a does so by transmitting wirelessly one or more test vectors to test station A 904 a. Step 1004 may also include setting a flag in the main memory 148 of tester I 902 a indicating that testing is underway at the selected test station—test station A 904 a.

After initiating testing of die 1 916 a of wafer 914 at the selected test station 904 a at step 1004, tester I 902 a determines at step 1006 whether it has received any messages. If not, tester I 902 a selects another of the on-line testers at step 1008, which may be accomplished generally as described above with respect to FIG. 4. In this example, tester I 902 a selects test station B 904 b at step 1008. Tester I 902 a then repeats the process of FIG. 10 beginning at step 1003. That is, tester I 902 a sends a message to tester II 902 b that test station B 904 b is now selected, and tester I 902 a initiates testing of die 1 916 a of wafer 914 at the new selected test station—test station B 904 b. As this process continues, tester I 902 a initiates testing of die 1 916 a of all of the wafers 914 in each of the on-line test stations 904, and tester I 902 a sends a message to tester II 902 b each time one of the test stations is selected.

Referring now to FIG. 11, after initialization, tester II 902 b waits for messages at step 1101. In response to a message sent by tester I 902 a at step 1003 of FIG. 10 identifying a selected test station, tester II 902 b initiates testing of die 2 916 b of the wafer 914 at the selected test station at step 1109. Like tester I 902 a, in this example, tester II 902 b initiates testing of die 2 916 b by wirelessly transmitting one or more test vectors to the selected test station.

As should be apparent, the operation of the process of FIG. 10 in tester I 902 a and the process of FIG. 11 in tester II 902 b results in the roughly simultaneous initiation of testing of die 1 916 a (by tester I 902 a) and die 2 916 b (by tester II 902 b) of the wafer 914 at the selected test station.

Referring now to FIG. 12, after initialization, each test station 904 a–904 c waits for messages at step 1201. Upon receiving test vectors from one of the testers 902 (sent by tester I 902 a at step 1004 of FIG. 10 or tester II 902 b at step 1109 of FIG. 11), the test station 904 writes the test vectors through the probes 912 of probe card 908 (see steps 1206, 1210, 1212). If the test vectors were received from tester I 902 a, the test station 904 writes the test vectors to die 1 916 a; if the tester vectors were received from tester II 902 b, the test station 904 writes the test vectors to die 2 916 b. Preferably, the test vectors include both test data and an identification of the probes 912 through which the test data is to be written. The test station 904 then collects response data produced by the dice in response to the test vectors and buffers the response data at step 1211. The test station 904 then sends a message at step 1213 to the tester 902 from which the test vectors were received indicating that the tests are completed.

Referring again to FIG. 10, tester I 902 a, upon receiving a message from a test station 904 indicating that testing has completed (see steps 1006, 1010), processes the results of the testing at step 1012, which may include such things as sending a message to the test station 904 requesting transmission of the test results. In this example, wafer 914 must be moved after testing dice 916 a, 916 b to contact and test dice 916 c, 916 d. At step 1017, if tester I 902 a has received an indication from tester II 902 b that testing of die 2 916 b has been completed, tester I 902 a causes the test station 904 to move the wafer 914 to contact and test dice 916 c, 916 d.

Referring now to FIG. 11, tester II 902 b, upon receiving a message from a test station 904 indicating that the testing has completed (see steps 1106, 1110), tester II 902 b processes the results of the testing at step 1112, which may include such things as sending a message to the test station requesting transmission of the test results. At step 1113, tester II 902 b sends a message to tester I 902 a that testing of die 2 916 b has been completed. Referring now to FIG. 10, upon receiving such a message from tester II 902 b, tester I 902 a causes the test station 904 to move the wafer 914 to contact and test dice 916 c, 916 d if testing of die 1 916 a has been completed. (See steps 1007, 1015.)

Referring again to FIG. 12, a test station 904 that receives a message from one of the testers 902 a, 902 b requesting the results of testing sends the test results to the tester 902 at step 1216 (see also steps 1206, 1214). Element 1218, labeled “other,” in FIG. 12 represents other tasks that might be performed by a test station 904. Moving the wafer in response to a command from tester I 902 a (as discussed above) is an example of such a task. A message originating from any number of possible sources stopping the process of FIG. 12 is another example. Stopping the process and other miscellaneous tasks may be performed at step 1018 in FIG. 10 and 1118 in FIG. 11.

As with other processes described above, a new test station may send a messages to tester I 902 a requesting to be brought on line. Likewise, an on-line test station may send a message to tester I 902 a requesting to be taken office line. Such requests are processed by tester I 902 a at steps 1014, 1016 of FIG. 10, and may be accomplished in a manner generally similar to step 416 of FIG. 4 as described above.

As mentioned previously, the processes illustrated in FIGS. 2–5, 7, 8, and 10–12 are exemplary only and not to be taken as limiting. Similarly, the systems shown in FIGS. 1, 6, and 9 are exemplary only and not to be taken as limiting.

It should be apparent that, in all of the processes illustrated in FIGS. 4, 6, and 10, provisions may be made for by passing steps 408, 608, and 1008 if no new test stations are available. Such provisions are, however, well within the skill of a person of ordinary skill in the field and need not be discussed. Similarly, provisions for processing error conditions, exiting the processes illustrated in FIGS. 2–5, 7, 8, and 10–12, or processing multiple messages are well within the skill of a person of ordinary skill in the field and also need not be discussed.

Note that probe cards, such as probe card 108 in FIG. 1 and probe card 908 in FIG. 9, are often capable of contacting many more than one die at a time. Thus, die 116 b in FIG. 1 may represent a plurality of dice being contacted by probe card 108. Likewise, each of dice 916 a and 916 b in FIG. 9 may represent a plurality of dice being contacted by probe card 908.

Although specific embodiments and applications of the invention have been described in this specification, there is no intention that the invention be limited to these exemplary embodiments and applications or to the manner in which the exemplary embodiments and applications operate or are described herein. 

1. A method of testing in a system comprising a tester and a test station, said method comprising: transmitting a test directive wirelessly from said tester to said test station; running at said test station a test on an electronic device in accordance with said test directive; transmitting results of said test wirelessly from said test station to said tester; and adding another test station to said test system wherein: the transmitting step comprises transmitting test data wirelessly from said tester to said test station, said test data representing a plurality of tests for testing an electronic device; the running step comprises testing said electronic device by running said plurality of tests on said electronic device at said test station; and said step of adding another test station comprises said other test station transmitting wirelessly to said tester a request to be added to said test system.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of testing further comprises testing a plurality of electronic devices at said test station using said transmitted test data.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said test data comprises commands and said step of testing an electronic device comprises said test station executing said commands and thereby running said plurality of tests on said electronic device.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said electronic device comprises self-test circuitry and said step of executing commands comprises said test station initiating operation of said self-test circuitry.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said system further comprises a plurality of test stations, and said step of transmitting test data comprises transmitting test data to at least two of said test stations.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein test data transmitted to each of said at least two test stations is the same.
 7. The method of claim 5, wherein test data transmitted to at least one of said test stations is different than test data transmitted to another of said test stations.
 8. The method of claim 5, wherein said step of testing comprises testing at each of said at least two test stations an electronics device at said test station using test data transmitted to said test station.
 9. The method of claim 8 further comprising transmitting from each of said at least two test stations results of testing said electronic device at said test station.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said test station comprises a prober and said electronic device comprises a semiconductor wafer.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronic device comprises a packaged semiconductor die.
 12. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronic device comprises a singulated, unpackaged semiconductor die.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronic device comprises a multi-chip module.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein said test directive comprises a command, and said running step comprises said test station decoding said command.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein said test directive comprises a command, and said running step comprises said test station executing said command and thereby running said test on said electronic device.
 16. The method of claim 1, wherein said test directive comprises a test vector comprising data and locations to which said data is to be written.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein said locations comprise identifications of probes through which said test data is to be written to said electronic device.
 18. The method of claim 1, wherein: said transmitting step comprises transmitting a plurality of test directive wirelessly from said tester to said test station; and said running step comprises running at said test station a plurality of tests on said electric electronic device in accordance with said test directives.
 19. A method of testing in a system comprising a tester and a test station, said method comprising: transmitting a test directive wirelessly from said tester to said test station; and running at said test station a test on an electronic device in accordance with said test directive, wherein: said system comprises a plurality of testers, said step of transmitting comprises a first tester of said plurality of testers transmitting first test data to said test station; said step of running a test on an electronic device comprises performing a first test on said electronic device in accordance with said first test data; said method further comprising transmitting second test data wirelessly from a second tester of said plurality of testers to said test station; and performing a second test on said electronic device at said test station in accordance with said second test data.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein said first test and said second test are different tests.
 21. The method of claim 19, wherein a plurality of said electronic devices are disposed at said test station, and said first test is performed on a first subset of said plurality of electronic devices, and said second test is performed on a second subset of said plurality of electronic devices.
 22. The method of claim 19, wherein: the transmitting step comprises transmitting test data wirelessly from said tester to said test station, said test data representing a plurality of tests for testing an electronic device; and the running step comprises testing said electronic device by running said plurality of tests on said electronic device at said test station. 